However, there are a couple of significant problem caused by this type of secrecy. When the public is not fully informed, they will not know which policies to support and they will be easer for demagogues to fool. For example, hiding information about Islamist terrorism can prevent the public from understanding why a travel ban from terrorist supporting countries is a good idea. Hiding the fact that a mass shooting is a terrorist attack can prevent the public from understanding why stricter gun control laws will not prevent future attacks. When people do not have full information, they will lack the facts they need to refute lies used by opportunistic politicians who want to fool them and manipulate them.
We are told secrecy is necessary for reasons of national security. However that is not entirely correct. The secrecy exists for partisan political purposes that favor the Democratic party. The secrecy ensures unhindered immigration of people who will vote for the Democratic party, it lends support for stricter gun control laws, and it lends support for other partisan political purposes that favor the Democratic party and its political agenda. Secrecy makes it easier for Democrats to advance these policy objectives because the public lacks information that would show these policies are not in their interest.
Most government employees support the Democratic party because that party supports expanding the scope of the government and that gives government employees job security. When government employees decide what information should be kept secret, their political bias will induce them to withhold or release information in ways that are beneficial to the Democratic party even if those decisions harm the national interests of the United States. For example, sometimes terrorist organizations have goals which Democrats support. Antifa is one such organization, they want President Trump removed from office. Democrats have been saying Antifa's violence was justified. However, if Antifa is involved in a mass shooting like 1 October, the Democrats will no longer be able to portray Antifa's violence as justified and they will lose an ally in their efforts to have President Trump removed from office and they will be embarassed by their previous support for a terrorist organization. This would motivate government employees to keep secret any involvement by Antifa in the 1 October terrorist attack.
Related Articles
- DHS Whistleblower Phil Haney discusses the infiltration of Islamists into the US government.
- Dick Morris:"When Obama took office eight years ago, the first thing he did was to get rid of almost everybody in the FBI and the CIA and convert these institutions to bastions of liberalism."
- The intelligence agencies and the military industrial intelligence complex control the elected government of the US.
Evidence the authorities are not telling everything about the 1 October attack.
There are three independent forms of evidence that contradict what the authorities are saying about the 1 October attack: acoustic analysis of the gunfire, eyewitness accounts, and police radio communications.
The following video provides acoustic proof there were at least two shooters at the 1 October attack on the concert. It confirms what eye witnesses have said and contradicts the authorities' assertions there was only one shooter. According to the video above, in the recordings of the gunfire from the 1 October shooting, higher pitched sounds are bullets hitting the pavement, and lower pitched sounds are the gun firing. By measuring the lag between the two sounds the distance from the shooter can be determined. Analysis of videos from the concert identify shooters at two different distances ie. it confirms what eye witness have said: there were two shooters. One of the shooters is calculated to be at the distance to the hotel which helps to confirm the validity of the calculations. Another is much closer about half the distance. Both are recorded at the same time on some recordings so it cannot be due to recordings at different locations on the ground.
The next video shows an interview with Rene, a woman staying at the Bellagio Hotel in Las Vegas which is about 1.5 miles away from the Mandalay Bay Hotel. Rene describes a shooting at the Bellagio Hotel on 1 October at about 11:15 pm, about an hour after the shooting at the Mandalay Bay Hotel stopped. She says she and her husband were in the lounge when they heard shooting. Her husband was in the Marines and he recognzied the sound of automatic weapons fire. They dived under their table and security guards rushed in ordering everyone to "run". After she posted a video of the aftermath of the shooting at the Bellagio Hotel, other people who were there contacted her to affirm what she was saying. For example, one person said she heard on a taxi's radio that there were shots fired at the Bellagio Hotel. The authorities have said nothing about this second shooting that occurred about an hour after the shooting at the Mandalay Bay Hotel.
Below is her video from the Bellagio Hotel taken after the shooting there on 1 October.
This recording of police radio communications confirms the shooting at the Bellagio Hotel. At 1:19:32 you can hear, "Now we're getting shots fired at Caesars and the Bellagio".
18:51: ... "Confirmed there are at least 2 shooters with fully automtic weapons"
45:05: "Confirming, the Mandalay bay and Alibaba/Giles are the 2 shooting locations!"
The next video was made by a taxi driver at the Mandalay Bay Hotel. At the beginning of the video you can hear shooting. At about 45 seconds, there is more shooting and the driver says, "Now it sounds like its coming from farther away". It sounds to the driver of the car like there are two shooters, not one as the authorities maintain.
A Post at Rikki Raulerson's face book page.
Aria Hotel, Las Vegas, 1 October, 11 pm.
Cassie Harrison: "We were in Caesars Palace tonight and there was a shooting in there too. For some reason the news hasn't even mentioned this... We were in the food court and all of a sudden you see everyone running for their lives from the casino area right next to the food court. We took off and then I hear about 20 gun shots behind me.
I’ve been in law enforcement nearly 40 years & I’m suspicious about everything. We need to engage the public more. pic.twitter.com/rM63sRDOUf pic.twitter.com/0goEtO8svA
— David A. Clarke, Jr. (@SheriffClarke) October 5, 2017
Laura Loomer Interviews two Las Vegas shooting eyewitnesses who say there were multiple shooters.
Rocky Palermo (below) was shot during the 1 October attack. He is 100% certain there were shooters in the crowd at the concert.
This eyewitness says there was shooting near Planet Hollywood which is also near the Belagio Hotel. She thinks what she heard is probably the same shooting that witnesses at the Belagio heard.
38:01
People who want to try to make this a racial or political situation, it may very well be, but I will tell you this, when I was in that basement with people of all colors of all political parties, races, nationalities, and countries - I was with three Austrialians, 2 Canadians, a guy from Kansas, and two other Americans from elsewhere, and I'm originally from Detroit, okay? - we weren't thinking about any of that. Okay? We were helping each other. We were concerned about one another. And in that moment we were just human beings. And we were just all fighting for the same thing. And to come back out of that situation and see everybody fighting, over what? It's ridiculous. To me it's just utterly ridiculous. Because honestly I know for a fact if any of you were in the same situation and you had to survive and some Democrat or Republican was standing next to you, ... you'd drop all that stuff. So please just try to be a little bit nicer to one another.
Compilation of eyewitness videos by InfoWars:
Air traffic control tapes on the night of the Las Vegas shooting:
— Mike Tokes (@MikeTokes) October 29, 2017
"There's active shooters on the runway. They're on the airport property" pic.twitter.com/HZf3LBeAgk
Las Vegas air traffic control 10/1/17.
2:00
There's active shooters on the runway. The 19s are closed, we are in the process of trying to round them up. They're on the airport property.
Intellihub "Las Vegas" search results:
https://www.intellihub.com/?s=las+vegas
Intellihub has many articles you won't see anywhere else. I can't vouch for unreferenced articles but I will say that the author, Shepard Ambellas, seems to present facts and leaves evaluating the implications to the reader.
